Executive
Summary
In 2004, President
Bush set a national agenda for health care information technology
adoption when he shared his vision with the nation that every American
have an electronic health record (EHR) by 2014. While some progress
has been made, overall EHR adoption rates remain low in small physician
practices. Simon et al. (2007) report adoption rates are lower in
smaller practices, those not affiliated with hospitals, and those
that do not teach medical students or residents.
The focus of
the Economic Analysis of Health Information Technology (EA HIT)
in the Ambulatory Setting project was to develop and evaluate a
simulation tool/computational model (Model) used to predict adoption
rates of Electronic Health Records (EHR) in small physician practices
(less than 10 physicians).
iTelehealth
Inc. supported MDM Strategies, Inc. in leading the EA HIT Phase
II work for the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS),
Assistant Secretary for Programs and Evaluation (ASPE). The EA HIT
project focused on:
- Developing
a predictive Model that incorporates guidance from an objective
expert panel team
- Developing
a presentation tool to make the Model available to users
- Conducting
evaluation of the Model using third-party data sources
- Collecting
data for the model through a limited online study of small practice
physicians adoption perceptions and variables
- Based on
Model outcomes, identify/validate attributes related to the EHR
adoption and implementation issues (e.g., policies, incentives,
cost of ownership, etc.)
Successful execution
of the Phase II activities resulted in completing a process of Model
development by collecting of a large amount of independent data,
the normalization of that data, and the development of four (4)
predictive Models. With each Model version, the usability, robustness,
and predictive power of the Models increased. The modeling process
showed that the decision to adopt an EHR is a very complex process,
involving many inter-related factors and perceptions. In order to
effectively encourage adoption, any solution has to account for
multiple factors to include, but not limited to: clinical, economic,
demographic, technological, and perceptual. Given the results of
the EA HIT modeling exercise, single factors or overly simplified
initiatives are likely to have unintended results. The EA HIT Model
provides policymakers with a tool that allows for some prospective
quantification of these results, supporting more finely tuned policy
initiatives. The Model can support complex and detailed “what-if”
scenario analysis as well as the identification of perceptions and
factors that bear on practice adoptions choices. Once identified,
these factors can be better studied and/or addressed.
|
|